During
Saturday’s opening online session of an Advent retreat I’m leading, someone
asked what to do when “the least of these” are overwhelming in terms of kinds,
conditions, and count.
Of
course “the least of these” comes from this past Sunday’s Gospel reading from
Matthew when those who tend to the stranger, the hungry, the thirsty, the
naked, the sick, and the imprisoned are welcomed into eternal life in the reign
of Christ.
My
response was that Jesus’ ethic of attending to the nearest neighbor could be a
way to focus. I thought but did not
quote the Stephen Stills hit, “if you can’t be with the one you love, love the one you’re with,” advice borrowed from musician Billy Preston.
For
example, the Samaritan proved “good” because he tended to the stripped, robbed,
and beaten traveler along the road between Jericho and Jerusalem, while the
priest and Levite passed by, perhaps on their way to the Temple. Ritual
requirements of the time would have rendered them unclean and unable to enter
the temple, given the man’s condition.
But
most of us are not on our way to perform such solemn duties. Rather, we are
picking up the kids or the dry cleaning or groceries for dinner. Unlike Jesus,
we don’t live in a world expecting that the kingdom of God could break in
before we get to Kroger’s. So we prioritize.
The
questioner was lamenting that we are torn among many divergent needs in our
communities. How do we handle that?
NPR recently reported a study indicating that people are more likely to give to a
cause when it’s singular or limited. Feature a homeless person or an abused
animal and donations pour in. But if you add “there are millions of people with
no shelter” or “there are millions of animals mistreated,” donors are
overwhelmed and feel their gift would make little difference, and give less or
not at all.
From
time to time I have felt guilty that I do not volunteer at a soup kitchen. I
have had to remind myself that my blog and my books and my correspondence offer
a bit of spiritual soup for readers’ souls, and given that it brings in very
little money, I do most of what I do as a volunteer. It is my calling rather
than a job.
I
can’t do everything. Neither can you. But we can each do something.
Forget
about the millions. Think about one neighbor. A Palestinian. An Israeli. A
Syrian refugee. An Ebola patient. A wounded veteran. A violated woman. A
transgender child. An undocumented immigrant. An elderly person. A youth with little
hope. A homeless pet.
Then
figure out how you can make that individual’s life a little better, either
personally or through existing organizations. And for God’s sake, let’s all do
what we can to influence public policy, the most extensive and inclusive way of
helping “the least of these.”
This
week I learned that the gay priest and poet Gerard Manley Hopkins was once
asked how best to believe. A spiritually “sophisticated” response was
anticipated, but Hopkins said only, “Give alms.”
Maybe
a case of spiritual “practice makes perfect”?
Other research indicates that the same area of the brain is pleasured when we give as
when we meditate or win the lottery. So, let’s feel good as well as believe by
attending to a neighbor, nearby or across the globe. It’s a better bet than playing
the lottery!
Related Post: Our Own Fiscal Cliffs
Who made ya, baby? Consider reading this post for American
Thanksgiving tomorrow: The Making of You
Please
support this blog ministry by clicking here or mail to MCC, P.O. Box 50488,
Sarasota FL 34232 USA, designating “Progressive Christian Reflections” in the
memo area of your check or money order. Thank you!
Progressive Christian
Reflections
is entirely supported by readers’ donations. It is an authorized Emerging
Ministry of Metropolitan Community Churches, a denomination welcoming seekers
as well as believers.
Copyright © 2014 by
Chris R. Glaser. Permission granted for non-profit use with attribution of
author and blogsite. Other rights reserved.
