My heart and prayers go out to Emanuel
A.M.E. Church in Charleston, South Carolina.
Today’s post was first published in The Huffington Post on Monday.
Just
when I had concluded that Jeb Bush was the likely Republican nominee for
president in 2016, he said something that dumbfounded me:
I hope I’m not going to get castigated for saying this by my priest back home, but I don’t get economic policy from my bishops or my cardinals or my pope. And I’d like to see what [the pope] says as it relates to climate change and how that connects to these broader, deeper issues before I pass judgment. But I think religion ought to be about making us better as people and less about things that end up getting in the political realm. (New York Times, June 17, 2015)
“Religion
ought to be about making us better as people” means to me that it makes us
better voters, better legislators, better elected officials—all devising better
policies as political actors, thus “getting in the political realm.”
“I
don’t get economic policy from my bishops or my cardinals or my pope” (and
presumably his priest) makes me wonder who Jeb’s spiritual advisors are, then,
and if Jesus and his teachings even count in his views on public policy.
I’m
not saying this is true of Jeb Bush, but many Christians see Jesus and the
church simply as their “Get-out-of-hell-free” card in a game of spiritual
Monopoly, and view religion as concerned with personal morals rather than
economic realities. That’s why they easily claim their religious values when it
comes to opposing women’s reproductive rights and same-sex marriage.
But
Jesus and his followers proclaimed a gospel that has as much to do with
economic concerns as spiritual realities. In truth, conversion anticipated care
for “the least of these.” Jesus admonished the one percent to “sell what you
have and give to the poor” and, in the Lord’s Prayer no less, just after being
given our daily bread, we are to forgive our debtors as God overlooks our own
indebtedness. And in his proclamation of God’s in-breaking government, Jesus
fed and healed the multitudes as he offered them spiritual wisdom.
As
to Pope Francis’s recent encyclical on the environment and the disproportionate
effects of human-caused climate change on the poor—this is not just religion
speaking, but mainstream science as well.
In
Merchants of Doubt, Naomi Oreskes and
Erik M. Conway “reported that dubious tactics had been used over decades to
cast doubt on scientific findings relating to subjects like acid rain, the
ozone shield, tobacco smoke and climate change,” according to an article in The New York Times’ Science Times, “And
most surprisingly in each case, the tactics were employed by the same group of
people.” They followed the playbook of the tobacco industry in planting doubt
about the conclusions of accepted scientific studies:
The central players were serious scientists who had major career triumphs during the Cold War, but in subsequent years apparently came to equate environmentalism with socialism, and government regulation with tyranny. (New York Times, June 16, 2015)
There
may be a parallel in religion. That the encyclical was leaked before its
planned release may suggest the work of similar “central players…who had career
triumphs” who resent Pope Francis’s attempts at reform and wanted to embarrass
him regarding his ability to manage the Vatican.
Political
and religious conservatives claim the rights of religion in the marketplace of
ideas and the public square. Why not support the same claim when religion and
science come together to save the planet and its poor?
Readers
are this blog’s only means of support. To donate, please click here or mail to Metropolitan Community Churches, P.O. Box 50488, Sarasota FL
34232 USA, designating “Progressive Christian Reflections” in the memo area of
your check or money order.
Thank
you!
Copyright © 2015 by Chris R. Glaser.
Permission granted for non-profit use with attribution of author and blogsite.
Other rights reserved.
No comments:
Post a Comment