Possibly
not even residents of Ferguson, Missouri fully comprehend what’s happened there
in recent months after the shooting death of Michael Brown by Officer Darren
Wilson. Wilson was not indicted by a
grand jury last week, prompting protests and rioting not only there, but in
other cities, including my own, Atlanta, where black and white seem to work
together better than in any city in which I’ve lived.
A
CNN commentator complained about the extended “whine” of the Ferguson district
attorney regarding initial reports by social media and the media in general,
but I do think social media as well as the internet can enable a virtual lynch
mob to form opinions without a full and accurate story, not to speak of due
process. We love that when it topples despotic dictators, but we should be
concerned when it may bias either a judicial outcome or public opinion,
especially when sparking violence.
I
have found it difficult to talk about these events even with people who share
my political views, so strong are our opinions.
So
I want to talk about the larger problem when it comes to conversation about
this and all contentious issues. “Stand your ground” laws that permit use of
violence to protect ourselves are simply outward signs of an inner, spiritual
problem. “Standing up for yourself” has now become “stand your ground” when it comes to any
issue, as if the ground you’re standing on is first, yours, and second, high
holy ground.
When
I believe the ground belongs to me and mine, when I consider mine the high
moral ground, or even worse, holy ground, there is little room for listening to
the concerns of another. This could apply not only to our conversations about Ferguson,
but also about Washington and Jerusalem and every other place of conflict.
Forgive
me for once again citing NPR, but a recent study reveals that people fail to “hear”
opposing views because they doubt their opponent is basing their opinion on positive
motivations.
Adequate
incentive is required to begin to see another’s perspective: in the study, a
financial incentive did the trick! I believe a spiritual incentive could as
well. As Jesus said, go the extra mile, turn the other cheek, give your cloak
as well as your coat, love your enemies and pray for those who oppose you.
What
also interferes is that we defensively fear the other is assigning negative
motivations to us.
When
you’re standing your ground, it’s
hard to share, and find common
ground.
I
personally experienced this recently while discussing a New York Times article about police experts speculating if Officer
Wilson could have performed his duties in such a way to create a different
outcome. On ABC News Wilson unequivocally rejected that anything he might have
done could have avoided the tragedy. Now, in our litigious and “gotcha”
culture, I understand that self-doubt and uncertainty become indicators of
guilt or malfeasance, but if I had done something that ended in someone’s
death—no matter the circumstances—I would have been wracked with guilt and
doubt, wondering what I could have done to avoid or prevent that.
But
trying to tell this to a friend came across as minimizing Michael Brown’s
bullying and threatening behavior and maligning Darren Wilson, which I did not
intend.
Both
Brown and Wilson could be said to “stand their ground.” Republicans and
Democrats, Israelis and Palestinians do the same. And it begets either
stalemate or tragedy.
The
day I write this I felt encouraged by another Times story by Manny Fernandez and Brent McDonald about someone
trying to bridge the gap in Ferguson. Lt. Jerry Lohr, who manages the security
of the Ferguson police headquarters, wears no riot gear and carries no baton.
He treats protestors like people, saying “please” and “thank you.”
“Allowing
people to talk on a one-on-one level does a lot as far as building bridges,” he
says. “They may not agree with what I’m doing, but now they at least know my
name and my face. I’m human again. They realize that I’m a person. I’m not just
a uniform. We have to bridge this gap. It’s not going to happen overnight. This
is going to be a long-term relationship, a long-term commitment, that both
sides are going to have to make.”
Preach
it, brother!
Related Posts:
Please
support this blog ministry by clicking here or mailing to MCC, P.O. Box 50488,
Sarasota FL 34232 USA, designating “Progressive Christian Reflections” in the
memo area of your check or money order. Thank you!
Progressive Christian
Reflections
is entirely supported by readers’ donations. It is an authorized Emerging
Ministry of Metropolitan Community Churches, a denomination welcoming seekers
as well as believers.
Copyright © 2014 by
Chris R. Glaser. Permission granted for non-profit use with attribution of
author and blogsite. Other rights reserved.
Thanks, Chris. I have been somewhat helped by remembering the transactional analysis stuff. When i fail to understand how those who seem to seek to "oppress" see themselves, perhaps subconsciously, as parent and those they "oppress" as child. It is rationalization but when i look at it that way--i can feel more generous about their well-meaning as fellow human beings. I want to go on to explain further, but i know you can "get it". Thanks again for your discipline.
ReplyDeleteI appreciate this very much, Chris. You have articulated very well my own discomfort with an escalating lynch mob mentality enhanced by social media, along with my simultaneous revulsion at "stand your ground" responses and laws. The intersection with racism in all of this makes for a toxic climate in which dialogue and understanding are in retreat. I'm glad I wasn't preaching last Sunday. My sermon at UUC after Trayvon Martin was challenging enough -- "Mr. Rogers Doesn't Live Here Any More."
ReplyDeleteLove the title and sentiment of your sermon!
Delete