Our orchids are budding and blooming
this month thanks to Wade's care.
I
confess I am approaching Oliver Sacks’s posthumously published book, The River of Consciousness, as a sacred
text. The richness and depth of both his writing style and his content made his
articles in the newspaper favorites of mine in the years preceding his death.
The
first essay, “Darwin and the Meaning of Flowers,” which I anonymously alluded
to last week, has not disappointed. Darwin observed that flowers and insects
co-evolved, and he once contrasted his (in Sacks’s words) “frontal
assault…on creationism” in On the Origin
of Species by Means of Natural Selection to his subsequent work with
flowers.
In
Darwin’s words, “no one else has perceived that my chief interest in my orchid
book has been that it was a ‘flank movement’ on the enemy,” the opponents of
evolution. As Darwin’s botanist friend Asa Gray suggested, if his book on
orchids “had appeared before the Origin,
the author would have been canonized rather than anathematized by the natural theologians.”
In
other words, we human beings would have felt less threatened understanding how
flowers and insects evolved characteristics over eons that were mutually
beneficial. The evolution of mammals like us threatened our sense of
superiority, our presumption that we were made ex nihilo in the image of God, not descended from other animals.
The
second but more ancient Genesis creation myth that describes Yahweh shaping the
first human being from earth is closer to Darwin’s own observation in The Descent of Man, “Man still bears in
his bodily frame the indelible stamp of his lowly origin.” Dust we art, to dust
we shalt return.
Sacks
writes,
The notion of such vast eons of time—and the power of tiny, undirected changes which by their accumulation could generate new worlds, worlds of enormous richness and variety—was intoxicating. Evolutionary theory provided, for many of us, a sense of deep meaning and satisfaction that belief in a divine plan never achieved. The world that presented itself to us became a transparent surface, through which one could see the whole history of life.
Reminds
me of Paul’s metaphor of how “we see through a glass darkly.”
With
Oliver Sacks,
I rejoice in the knowledge of my biological uniqueness and my biological antiquity and my biological kinship with all other forms of life. This knowledge roots me, allows me to feel at home in the natural world, to feel that I have my own sense of biological meaning, whatever my role in the cultural, human world.
Sacks
credits this insight to “Darwin’s epiphany on the meaning of flowers” and
Sacks’s own childhood experience of the natural world.
I
once worked with a pastor who gave as much attention to the arrangement of
flowers, cuttings, and plants on the chancel as he did to the words of sermons,
the sacraments, prayers, and liturgies. When he died, I entitled his eulogy,
“The Importance of Flowers.” To this day, I remember less of his theology than
of his aesthetics—or truer, his aesthetic was
his theology.
The
impertinence of youth caused me once to chide my father for spending so much
time on his garden “rather than on something that lasts.” “What lasts?” was his
wise response, making no apology.
Possibly
the better way to proclaim the Gospel is to “say it with flowers.”
Last Wednesday we passed
the 300,000 mark in the number of visits since this blog began. Last week’s post did extraordinarily well, with 2700 visits so far. These figures do not include
subscribers.
Thank you for any donation to this blog ministry:
Be sure to scroll down to
the donate link below its description.
Or mail to MCC, P.O. Box 50488, Sarasota FL 34232 USA, designating
“Progressive Christian Reflections” in the memo area of your check or money
order. Thank you!
Copyright © 2018 by Chris R. Glaser.
Permission granted for non-profit use with attribution of author and blogsite.
Other rights reserved.
Tears in my eyes. As a lover of flowers and the beautiful loveliness that they (silently)manifest around us, I totally agree. Your father was wise. We would do well to "consider the lilies."
ReplyDelete