Surprisingly,
Yale Law School professor Dan Kahan has found in a recent study that beliefs
about such things as evolution and global warming are not necessarily based on
ignorance, but often on a knowledge of the scientific facts that is wilfully
resisted because of a person’s political or religious identity and affiliation.
In other words, engaging in what the economist Paul Krugman characterizes as “wishful
thinking.”
I
first found out about the study from New
York Times columnist Krugman’s application of the principle to economics in
“Belief, Facts, and Money.” Then I read the Times
article by political scientist Brendan Nyhan that Krugman references about
Kahan’s discoveries, “When Beliefs and Facts Collide.”
People
may be current on the science of evolution and global warming, but because of
their identities as evangelical Christians or conservative Republicans, they
reject the science because it doesn’t fit their faith and values. Surveys
indicate the gap between facts and beliefs are wider among those believers familiar
with the facts, because, apparently, they know what facts to reject!
This
explains so much.
In
college, when I spoke out against the Vietnam War, from churches to Rotarian groups
and Kiwanis clubs, I believed that if people knew the factual history of
Vietnam from French colonialism to American involvement, they too would oppose
the war. I produced a page-long summary of that history for distribution,
certain that would convert my listeners.
What
I found was that the historical facts didn’t matter to most, even when they
supposed them to be true. “My country: Love it or Leave It,” was not just a
bumper sticker to them, it was a belief system. And the myth of the Domino
theory of how communism spread further undergirded support of American
intervention.
In
churches, when I spoke for the full welcome and inclusion of LGBT people, listeners
resisted current biblical scholarship and contemporary scientific studies. John
Boswell’s landmark tome Christianity,
Social Tolerance, and Homosexuality and his subsequent Same-Sex Unions in Premodern Europe, revealing that historically
the church has not been of one mind on homosexual persons and relationships,
did not convince those Christians most opposed to homosexuality, nor did it
convince those gays and lesbians most opposed to the church. Indeed, Boswell
told me that he had anticipated vigorous attacks on his work from the church,
but not from the LGBT community!
Long
after HIV was identified as the culprit causing AIDS, and long after it was
proven that HIV could not be communicated by casual contact, a well-informed evangelical
Christian friend of mine insisted that she believed it could be, thus
warranting caution and quarantines. Today there are still myths held dearly
around HIV/AIDS by those across the political spectrum and around the world in
spite of exhaustive medical evidence that contradicts them.
Niehan
writes, “One implication of Mr. Kahan’s study and other research in this field
is that we need to try to break the association between identity and factual
beliefs on high-profile issues” such as evolution and climate change.
Progressive
Christians know about this process. We identify as Christian, but we don’t feel
compelled to express our faith as “old time religion.” It’s vital that we
out-evangelize our evangelical brothers and sisters by spreading the good news
that Christians can be Christians without taking the Bible literally, without
accepting doctrine without question and reason, without losing our minds or our
hearts.
We
too engage in “wishful thinking”: that all might honor human rights, hunger to
know the truth, work agreeably with those with whom they differ, accept responsibility
as careful stewards of the earth, and practice a vocation of compassion for all.
+++
Progressive Christian
Reflections is an authorized
Emerging Ministry of MCC.
You are its sole source of financial support. Please click here to make a tax-deductible contribution. Please
invite your congregation to include it in its mission budget. Thank you!
You are encouraged to
use a post or quotes in personal reflection, worship, newsletters, and classes,
referencing the blog address when possible: http://chrisglaser.blogspot.com. Check out past posts in the right rail on the blogsite,
catalogued by year and month. For specific topics, use the search feature in
the upper left corner of the site.
Copyright © 2014 by
Chris R. Glaser. Permission granted for non-profit use with attribution of
author and blogsite. Other rights reserved.
"work agreeably with those with whom they differ"I can only do this in spurts. Passive/aggressive?? or what------"We are of different worldviews" they say and that is end of it. So? where are and how to identify fence-sitters because they are the only ones open to discussions i think. i am not even open to discussion. So, i think others are not either. My bad.
ReplyDelete